It’s so refreshing to see a cacophonous conglomeration, of truly international representation, competitively joined, in individual quests to achieve the glory of winning The Football World Cup; it actually goes against everything international relations represents. Two extremes of this anomalous congregation hold an incredulous court, of non-acrimonious gathering: religious diversity, ably represented, cannot be more stupefying than the west versus east conundrum, holding world populations to ransom, in their despicable denomination of religious opposition. Iran and The USA enjoin sporting rivalry which, if it was employed in worldly affairs, would be perfectly acceptable and, go a long way in appeasing world atrocities, saving millions of lives.
FIFA suffer tumultuous levels of criticism, negatively lustred, but the achievements of this ‘illuminatist’ organisation are positively phenomenal. It proves, and very much so, the Christian and Muslim worlds can co-exist – side by side – in global existence, on an otherwise non-violent level of tolerance, with personal opposition – each to the other – channelled into sporting rivalry. Such a state of affairs opens the door, to: Israel, Arabia, Kenya, Syria, Pakistan, China and a host of other nations, embroiled in the religious nonsense of war, in the name of their anomalous gods.
Governments seem not to notice, or realize the precedents set – especially in this 2014 renewal – by supposedly warring nations and their peacefully abiding citizens congregating in Brazil, as fervently exhilarated and well-entertained supporters.
So far, at the ending of the group stages, this year’s exhibition of football skill and team participation is the best, by far, I have ever witnessed – inclusive of 1970. and 1966 – since I have been old enough to understand what football is about, and its intended principles of representation. If only those Illuminatii could organize a Religion World Cup, taking away the life-taking elements religion employs, out of all equations devised as necessary for participation. The teams, of religious defenders, would have their Holy books, and historic cornerstones, as entry verification. Arguments, concerned with legitimacy of selected individual deities, could begin. Judges would have to be preselected, based on intelligence and reputation, with unquestionable references to their steadfast characters; world audiences could be allowed to vote, on clear-cut definitions of Truth, against irretrievable statutes of ungodly depositions.
In an ideal world, we would proceed to define Utopia, bringing an end to global war, allowing humanity to focus, on: disease, hunger, inequality, generations of youth dependant on global peace, stability and futurist concerns.
All religions should have one statute of determination which ‘is’ unquestionable: God, The Almighty – in whatever form, belief or criteria of knowledge – is Righteousness. It is quite impossible to determine Righteousness, without Truth, so; all religions should start with Righteousness as their initial building block. There are many tributaries claiming to be of religion but, I am concerned with those who claim to have the worship of The Righteous God, at the epicentre of their beliefs, so that Truth emanates as the essential guiding statute. It would then be impossible for Righteousness to kill and commit life-taking atrocities in the defence of, what would be, simplified belief structures. Governments, I personally believe, should be employed to save lives. There are too many wars, too many people dying and too many oppositional forces responsible, for governments to be legitimated as representations of Righteousness and Truth. The Christian God and his Son, as well as the Muslim God and his prophet should epitomise Righteousness and Truth therefore, having no place for killing and murder.
base
bafl 's arena 